I will be grateful to see eHarmony reacting within recognized blog to a write-up called “Marriage-Maker Claims Are Tied in Knots ” from the Wall Street diary. The WSJ post examines many wedding statistics introduced by internet dating sites like eHarmony as well as the methodology familiar with estimate these types of data. We spoke a little about it subject and, a couple of weeks ago if the original WSJ post ended up being posted (see Story).
The WSJ post did not look to kindly regarding the statistics launched by internet dating sites, and for the the majority of part I concur with the writer. The public ought knowing just how these stats tend to be produced. Of the many adult dating sites discussed for the WSJ post, “eHarmony stands out as among the more mindful people”. This is not exactly a glowing report for eHarmony thus, they chose to upload a reply to their blog.
In the eHarmony blog post they’re going into further details on the way they calculated that their particular dating site was accountable for 2per cent of marriages in america, from 12-month duration closing March 2007. Almost all of the details we currently realized about from a previously circulated PDF file entitled “eHarmony | Harris involved 2007 Marriage Metrics few eHarmony Marriages” (see Story), nevertheless blog post really does eliminate some more details. Just what this web site article does program is actually, eHarmony is wanting becoming as open and clear the help of its investigation findings as you possibly can. In my opinion the name “start telecommunications” may indeed end up being your best option for any formal eHarmony web log.
This is actually the full eHarmony reaction to the Wall Street Journal about how exactly they determine their unique wedding data. For additional information about this dating site, read our very own article on eHarmony.